Fallacy Summary and Application Paper

A fallacy is a ?general emblem of appeal (or grade of argument) that resembles good reasoning, but that we should not find to be coaxing? (Bruce Thompsons, 2005). Fallacies have influenced the way that humans use comminuted opinion for many years. There are numerous different fallacies horizon the academic world. Three fallacies that this paper will focus on are Questionable name, evoke to Emotion, and Non-Sequitur. While each of these fallacies are sometimes used to commence decisions, they are not synthetical in a critical thinking process.

Questionable CauseQuestionable Cause can be described as ?when a causative connection is assumed without proof. All too often claims to a causal connection are based on a mere correlation? (Texas State, 2006). An example of this is ?Six months after vacuum-clean took office in 1929, the stock market crashed and the Great low gear began. He is therefore responsible for this tragic episode in our history? (Texas State, 2006). This fallacy is one of importance in critical thinking. By having no solid evidence that an event was triggered by another event can be dangerous to businesses. This type of fallacy can lead a supervisor to moot in a temporary fix, which ultimately, will only make the problem worse.

Appeal to Emotion?This fallacy is committed when someone manipulates peoples emotions in order to get them to accept a claim as being true? (The Nikor Project, 2006). An example of this would be a supervisor who asked an employee to finish a task. When the supervisor asks for the results the employee says that his dog died, therefore his car would not start, and his girlfriend left him last night, so I could not get the task done. A decimal point to keep in mind to avoid using the Appeal to Pity (Emotion) fallacy is to make sure...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .